By Fabio Vighi
Fabio Vighi, On Žižek's Dialectics: Surplus, Subtraction, Sublimation, Continuum, 2010, 189pp., $120.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780826464439.
Reviewed through Adrian Johnston, collage of recent Mexico
With his On Žižek's Dialectics: Surplus, Subtraction, Sublimation, Fabio Vighi offers an enticing and suggestive addition to the quickly growing to be physique of literature at the across the world well known Slovenian thinker and psychoanalytic theorist Slavoj Žižek. even supposing Vighi's identify could lead a possible reader at the beginning drawing close this e-book to anticipate a sustained dialogue of Žižek's Hegelianism in particular -- Hegel is a vital resource of proposal for Žižekian notion in all its a variety of dimensions (along with Kant, Schelling, Marx, Lacan, and Badiou) -- Vighi devotes the majority of his consciousness to serious analyses of the Lacan-inflected aspects of Žižek's reflections on issues political. What distinguishes Vighi's intervention from different on hand remedies of politics à los angeles Žižek is his major thesis that the purported loss of a pragmatic software equivalent to Žižekian theorizations of varied fresh and modern political phenomena is a advantage instead of a vice.
More accurately, Vighi, by means of his personal admission within the spirit if no longer constantly the letter of Žižek's writings, argues that the main time table to be pursued in gentle of the aim of reviving a demoralized and exhausted radical Left isn't the instant bounce into one more around of frenzied praxis (what Žižek, inverting a widely known word from well known psychology, dubs "aggressive passivity") as impotent outbursts striving in useless to bridge perceived gaps among thought and perform. in its place, from Vighi's standpoint, what's referred to as for these days is an intra-theoretical hard work of pondering, a reflexive contemplative exam of political concept itself (conducted below the counsel of Lacan and Žižek particularly, with relatively briefer references to Alfred Sohn-Rethel and Kojin Karatani as well). Vighi contends that purely via a reinvention of our principles approximately politics, together with most significantly these of our subconscious fantasies buttressing the very buildings of social area and our relationships to it, will we even start to wish with a purpose to envision paths of political perform with a true shot at reaching lasting, valuable change.
Vighi is at his most powerful while spelling out the various primary implications of psychoanalysis for political concept. With designated concentrate on Lacan's musings from the interval instantly earlier than, in the course of, and after could '68 (i.e., the Lacan of the 16th [1968-1969] and 17th [1969-1970] seminars), he sincerely and helpfully explains how Žižek's coupling of Marx avec Lacan calls for thorough-going ameliorations with admire to (post-)Marxism: alienation isn't a few transitory and surmountable socio-historical , yet "subjectivity's very situation of possibility" (p. 4); echoing not just Žižek, yet prior twentieth-century Freudo-Marxism (à los angeles Marcuse et al) (p. 28), Marxist thought and perform is confronted with the problem of integrating psychoanalytic conceptions of the subconscious to be able to have an opportunity of being exact and potent (pp. 43-44, sixty seven, 70, seventy two, 79); in particular apropos Lacanian research, Marx's radical leftist heirs needs to take into consideration manifestations of what Lacan frequently has in view whilst conversing of "jouissance" ("enjoyment," in particular what the later Lacan, just about Marx's surplus-value, names "plus-de-jouir" ["surplus-enjoyment"]) (pp. 57-58). a technique to place those issues is within the type of a basic declare to the impression powerful, powerful critique of political financial system is constructible basically via taking into cautious attention the operations of the libidinal economic climate -- and this being rather so within the period of world, digitalized shopper capitalism with which Žižek famously wrestles many times. Vighi rightly attracts readers' consciousness to subjects' socio-economically major investments in such things as commodities and careers on the libidinal degrees of wants, drives, and fantasies either unsleeping and subconscious (pp. 27, 33-35, 64).
Furthermore, I wholeheartedly advocate Vighi's prognosis of the Left's deadly failure to increase and set up a "politics of jouissance" (pp. 142, 153). As I placed it during this specified vein within the preface to Badiou, Žižek, and Political changes, "A confusing, clumsy lack of ability to grasp the affect-laden aesthetics of mass-media politics is basically one of the unhappy failings of today's Left. the place is its Leni Riefenstahl?" In different phrases, Vighi and that i, following in Žižek's footsteps, agree that fully ceding emotive and visceral aestheticizations of politics to the best, swiftly deeming this type of gestures as unacceptably "(proto-)fascist," is a grave mistake. An lack of ability to snatch humans by way of their guts, to place it crudely, and mobilize their robust emotions and impulses hobbles the publicly noticeable representatives of leftism within the late-capitalist universe; such representatives are caught many times reacting to right-wing events, the latter having a monopoly on political momentum because of taking part in upon the obscene, violent, and unpleasant jouissance of racist, xenophobic, misogynistic, homophobic, and jingoistic passions, whether purely in implicit, subliminal fashions. yet, as Vighi insightfully cautions, getting the juices flowing of a reinvented leftist enthusiasm (as passionate jouissance) isn't adequate on its own. His valuable thesis in regards to the desire for intra-theoretical labors as previous hazard stipulations for rather transformative extra-theoretical (i.e., functional) courses is without delay hooked up to this warning. one of many absolute best strains in Vighi's ebook warns, "before being captivated with its politics, today's left has to reinvent a politics to be passionate about." (p. 15)
Partly within the curiosity of complete disclosure, it may be pointed out that Vighi and that i engaged in an prior alternate within the foreign magazine of Žižek Studies, an trade initiated via Vighi's evaluation of my most up-to-date e-book and orbiting round the various matters on the center of his publication being reviewed the following. instead of recapitulate what was once at stake in that back-and-forth -- the reader is stated the articles stated within the previous sentence -- I intend in what follows to provide new criticisms of Vighi's place I didn't define formerly (and, i believe that my responses to Vighi within the foreign magazine of Žižek reviews additionally tackle Vighi's objections to my paintings as he articulates them in On Žižek's Dialectics [pp. one hundred thirty five, 175-176]).
I desire to commence through voicing a criticism approximately Vighi's relative restrictedness of concentration. seeing that Žižek is a philosopher who prospers via references to a variety of figures and components, serious engagements with Žižek demand digging into his favorite resources intensive. a quick look on the bibliography of On Žižek's Dialectics unearths a reliance upon a shockingly small variety of texts by way of such hugely proper authors as Hegel and Badiou. The parts of Lacan's corpus leaned upon are selectively restricted (again, the 16th and 17th seminars are seriously privileged), in particular in comparison with Žižek's multifaceted employments of the titanic complete sweep of the Lacanian oeuvre. Kant, Fichte, and Schelling, philosophers the most important for anyone's competently proficient realizing of Hegel, Marx, and dialectics -- either Žižek and Karatani underscore the foundational position of Kantianism of their endeavors -- are absent from the record of references. with regards to this, Vighi at one element refers in passing to "the philosophical cliché that there's no position for the individual's unfastened will in German idealism." (p. 108) contemplating the well known indisputable fact that Kant and the post-Kantian idealists see themselves because the German intellectual/cultural heirs of the French Revolution united, regardless of their changes, within the venture of reconstructing the whole lot of contemporary philosophy as a philosophy of freedom at the foundation of a deep appreciation of significantly self reliant subjectivity, it's doubtful what Vighi has in brain here.
Moreover, Vighi refrains from addressing a lot of the past literature on quite a few features of Žižek's physique of labor. Todd McGowan's 2004 ebook the tip of Dissatisfaction?: Jacques Lacan and the rising Society of Enjoyment, Jodi Dean's 2006 e-book Žižek's Politics, and Thomas Brockelman's 2008 publication Žižek and Heidegger: The query touching on Techno-Capitalism all hide huge parts of an analogous flooring mentioned in On Žižek's Dialectics (such as: the myriad new positive factors of post-industrial, overdue customer capitalism; the pervasive presence of jouissance in socio-political fields; the 20th- and early-twenty-first-century ancient shifts requiring differences of Marx's and Freud's principles; etc.). my very own 2008 learn of Žižek's dialectics as built at the foundation of his Lacanian appropriations of Kant, Fichte, Schelling, and Hegel (Žižek's Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist idea of Subjectivity) likewise gets no point out whatever. except Vighi failing to recognize whilst others have made sure issues prior to him, those significant omissions go away the reader already accustomed to Žižek scholarship thinking about simply how enormous a contribution Vighi relatively deals together with his personal book.
The narrowness of concentration isn't limited to the bibliography by myself. to take advantage of an adjectival word pricey to Hegel, On Žižek's Dialectics suffers from a few different types of "one-sidedness." for example, to start with, Vighi appropriately explicates Žižek's makes use of of Lacan to spot and take factor with specific shortcomings plaguing Marx's strategies and arguments. yet he spends no time reading the opposite part of this, specifically, Žižek's complementary Marxist misgivings apropos particular gains of Lacan's teachings (including the latter's notorious and reported ambivalence vis-à-vis could '68). Turning to a different instance, Vighi characterizes Žižek's Hegelian dialectics as emphasizing "that the floor on which we stand is often such as the proverbial flooring of our nightmares, insofar because it opens up at the abyss. Dialectics re-instates the primacy of contradiction, the violence of negativity, as that which cuts throughout each ontology of balance." (p. ninety one) This makes Žižek sound just like the Mao of 1937's "On Contradiction," a Mao to whom Žižek without delay addresses a couple of objections. For Hegel and Žižek (as good as Badiou), negativity is one, and just one, size of dialectical dynamics. either Žižek and Badiou, relatively with political dimensions in view and for a number of purposes, take nice care to emphasize that their theories of "acts" and "events" respectively aren't almost about explosive irruptions of destabilizing destructiveness. They either declare to be at the very least as attracted to the chilly, sobering "morning after," the drawn-out struggles to build sturdy and lasting innovative methods of being and doing.
In truth, Vighi's tacit quasi-Maoist one-sidedness apropos dialectics isn't really unrelated to the problems that the majority hassle me approximately On Žižek's Dialectics. As acknowledged during this review's commencing paragraph, the book's novelty with reference to the remainder of Žižek scholarship is its plea for reconceiving of the field of intra-theoretical (as against sensible) task because the area during which a real Žižekian act is a true threat (thus privileging the negativity of subjective serious mirrored image over the positivity of goal praxis) (pp. 6-7, 112, 153). as well as how I've already replied to this thesis -- Vighi endorsed it in his evaluation of Badiou, Žižek, and Political Transformations -- i need right here to check in an extra sequence of concerns.
Psychoanalysis evidently is vital to those conversations. And, analytic notions of the tip of research, notions generative of a lot controversy and debate in medical circles from Freud up in the course of the current (Lacanian ones included), exhibit questions and issues of specific analogues in Vighi's dealing with of the theory-practice rapport. certainly one of Freud's very overdue texts is "Analysis Terminable and Interminable" (1937), an essay dedicated to contemplating what constitutes a passable concluding second whilst an research can and may be delivered to a detailed. by way of this kind of theoretical (rather than medical) analyses with which Vighi is occupied, one wonders approximately "theorizing terminable and interminable." As Freud is the 1st to recognize, any research may in precept proceed on indefinitely until eventually demise because the subconscious is an ineliminable facet of the psychical equipment. within the absence of basically formulated standards stipulating what the top of political theorizing may possibly appear like (in either senses of "end"), Vighi hazards sounding as if he's trying to justify an interminable means of intra-theoretical mirrored image as an end-in-itself sans perform (or, in Žižekian parlance, a politics with no politics). even though he speaks to this fear (pp. 141-142, 149-151), he doesn't, for my part, be triumphant at satisfactorily addressing it and placing it to rest.
Admittedly, there certainly is anything to Vighi's finely-worded ultimate feedback approximately political thinkers wanting (in Lacanese) to "traverse their fantasies," thereby studying to place their theoretical unconsciouses to paintings within the provider of envisioning new collective chances (pp. a hundred and fifty five, 158-159, 163-164). yet, as indicated instantly above, the ineliminability of the subconscious capacity this intra-theoretical self-analysis may possibly cross on and on solipsistically with out ever resulting in whatever past itself (in phrases of extra-theoretical acts, activities, practice[s], etc.). moreover, an easy query should be posed during this context: If it have been easily an issue of considering our means out of the previous and into the recent, then why hasn't this occurred but on condition that a plethora of significant minds (Žižek, for example) have committed and proceed to commit themselves to this job of thinking?
Psychoanalysis presents a solution to this question: Self-analysis through a silent highbrow internal monologue is doomed to critical inadequacy and ineffectiveness. regardless of his repeated recourse to the analytic notion of the subconscious, Vighi's significant argumentative line is at risk of getting to depend upon an implicit and extremely un-psychoanalytic voluntarism in keeping with which reflexive theoretical self-consciousness on its own is keen and ready to pinpoint and conquer its personal blind spots. simply as analytic remedy depends a dialectic among subjectivity and objectivity -- the latter consists of the voicing aloud via free-associational speech of one's subjective soliloquy to a different addressee in addition to the continuing residing of one's existence off the sofa and out of doors the consulting room -- so too needs to an efficacious leftist politics deliver its subconscious dimensions to gentle via an interweaving of the considering the theoretical and the appearing of the sensible. The intra-theoretical with out the simultaneous extra-theoretical isn't more likely to get very a long way; storming the mind with out storming the gates has its limits. Or, as Trotsky expresses it, "one learns to trip on horseback merely whilst sitting at the horse."
 Adrian Johnston, Badiou, Žižek, and Political changes: The Cadence of switch, Evanston: Northwestern collage Press, 2009, p. xiv.
 Johnston, Badiou, Žižek, and Political changes, pp. xiv, 172-173; Vighi, On Žižek's Dialectics, pp. 15, 115.
 Fabio Vighi, "On practising conception: a few comments on Adrian Johnston's Badiou, Žižek, and Political Transformations," and Adrian Johnston, "Meta-Dialectics and the Balancing Acts of Žižekianism: A reaction to Fabio Vighi," overseas magazine of Žižek reports, vol. four, no. 1, 2010.
 Todd McGowan, the top of Dissatisfaction?: Jacques Lacan and the rising Society of delight, Albany: kingdom collage of recent York Press, 2004; cf. Adrian Johnston, "Unable to take pleasure in: A overview of Todd McGowan's the tip of Dissatisfaction?," South Atlantic overview, vol. 70, no. 1, wintry weather 2005, pp. 165-169.
 Jodi Dean, Žižek's Politics, manhattan: Routledge, 2006.
 Thomas Brockelman, Žižek and Heidegger: The query touching on Techno-Capitalism, London: Continuum, 2008.
 Adrian Johnston, Žižek's Ontology: A Transcendental Materialist conception of Subjectivity, Evanston: Northwestern collage Press, 2008.
 Johnston, Žižek's Ontology, pp. 264-268.
 Johnston, "Meta-Dialectics and the Balancing Acts of Žižekianism."
 Vighi, "On practising Theory."
 Leon Trotsky, Terrorism and Communism: A respond to Karl Kautsky (ed. Slavoj Žižek]), London: Verso, 2007, p. 97.
Copyright © 2004 Notre Dame Philosophical studies